Peer Review Process

Some policies regarding the review process for J-FRISMA: Journal of Financial Strategic, Investment, and Management Analysis:

1. Every submitted paper will be reviewed by reviewers.
2. The review process uses a double-blind review system, meaning that reviewers do not know the authors’ identities, and authors do not know the reviewers’ identities.
3. During the review process, reviewers assess the appropriateness of the title, abstract, discussion (findings), and conclusions. In addition, reviewers also evaluate the novelty, scientific impact, and references cited in the paper.

The reviewers’ feedback will serve as the basis for the Editor to make the following decisions:

1. Accept Submission
2. Revisions Required
3. Resubmit for review
4. Resubmit elsewhere
5. Decline Submission

An article may be rejected for publication for various reasons, including:

1. The article does not fall within the journal’s scope.
2. The article does not follow the rules of scientific writing or the writing guidelines.
3. Fundamental methodological errors.
4. The author refuses to implement the revision suggestions provided by the reviewers without a logical basis.
5. There are indications of plagiarism exceeding 20%.